Engagement with Stakeholders
Engaging openly with stakeholders and establishing leadership approaches for transparency and disclosure is a fundamental part of our approach to sustainability.

We believe that through sport, we have the power to change lives. This belief guides us in how we behave, and how we promote this behaviour through the athletes and partners we work with. Our actions are also illustrative of our commitment to creating a more sustainable world and to ensuring that sport is a platform for fairness and mutual respect.
As we strive to include and unite people in sport, we look to the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022™ as an important moment to bring the world together in celebration of football. At the same time, it is imperative to maintain the focus on ensuring fair and safe labor conditions, a welcoming and inclusive atmosphere for all fans in Qatar, and a lasting legacy for the future.
Respect for workers at FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022
We have extensive experience working with suppliers who produce the official World Cup match ball, jerseys and team wear and are committed to upholding human rights as a sponsor of major sporting events. As a consultee, we contributed to the development of the 2011 UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, and in their ongoing application to sporting events.
We are active in engaging with stakeholders in the non-governmental and corporate sponsor community. For example, in 2015 we hosted a stakeholder dialogue to discuss the role of corporate sponsors in major sporting events, bringing together representatives from FIFA, Amnesty International, the ILO, Transparency International, UNICEF, and the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights.
Although adidas as a sponsor was not involved in the decision to award the World Cup 2022 to Qatar, we have been engaged with our partner FIFA and other critical stakeholders – including the Qatari government, the Supreme Committee for the delivery of the World Cup, the International Labor Organization (ILO), international human rights and labor advocacy groups, and trade unions – to improve the human rights situation.
Together with other corporate sponsors, we called for FIFA to establish an independent Human Rights Advisory Board to better inform the development of their human rights program, including the hosting of World Cup events. adidas took a seat on this board, established in 2017, and alongside trade unions and advocacy groups we provided FIFA with critical feedback on the implementation of the 2022 World Cup.
To review the labor law and act as an independent local monitoring body for migrant worker rights in Qatar, we supported the ILO in setting up a project office in 2018 alongside other stakeholders.
External third parties, such as the global building industry union Building and Wood Worker's International (BWI), have confirmed that the working conditions in Qatar have improved in recent years, largely as a result of international focus and attention of the World Cup. For example, the ending of the Kafala system has strengthened the rights of migrant workers, and a non-discriminatory national minimum wage for all workers was introduced.
Looking to the future, we are supporting BWI’s proposal to establish a Migrant Worker Information Centre that builds on the worker welfare programs first developed for the World Cup construction sites in Qatar.
We understand that more can always be done – and we continue to work intensively with our partners regarding human rights at the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022, and other major sporting events around the world, to support efforts and reforms for the fair treatment of all workers.
Inclusion at the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022
We fully support every effort to make football a space where all individuals are fully accepted and able to be themselves to make the sport everyone’s game.
Since the World Cup was awarded to Qatar, we have been in regular contact with the organizing committee of the World Cup, our partner FIFA and non-governmental organizations to understand what measures are in place to ensure this ethos is respected and felt at the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022.
We have strongly advocated for unrestricted access for all visitors regardless of nationality, religion, sexual orientation or ethnic background. We expect the World Cup to be fully accessible to all visitors. If there are any infringements, we will pursue the matter.
Community legacy and impact of the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022
Outside of the tournament in 2022, we have been working on projects in the region with the aim to make sports more inclusive:
- We have partnered with Aspire academy in Qatar to provide greater access to football facilities for young people across the country.
- Inspiring the next generation of female footballers is a key priority for us. In the first half of 2022 we have welcomed five female professionals to our brand from the MENA region, including Saudi Arabia national team player and global brand ambassador, Farah Jefry.
- The first match with the new Official World Cup ball “Al Rihla” was hosted in Qatar and brought together international football icons such as Kaka and Iker Casillas alongside aspiring young footballers from the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
- Since the launch of Al Rihla, the ball has traveled around the world, and we have teamed with local football communities in all six cities on the journey who are working to improve access and equity in football.
- 1 per cent of World Cup ball Al Rihla’s net sales will go to Common Goal, a charitable football movement, to positively impact lives across the world. In 2021 we launched a long-term partnership with Common Goal and pledged 1 per cent of net sales of all globally sold adidas footballs to Common Goal.
adidas’ principles for supply chain and working conditions
We have been working to ensure fair working conditions in our supply chain for more than 25 years. We are committed to ensuring fair labor practices, fair wages and safe working conditions. Throughout our global supply chain, we monitor and report on the results, setting standards for the entire industry.
Since 1998, we have published our Workplace Standards that require all companies in our supply chain to progressively raise employee living standards through wage systems, benefits, welfare programs and other services.
We employ a team of 50 specialists who work every day on pushing adidas towards more sustainable business practices in our supply chain. Through more than 1,200 factory assessments in 2021, we reviewed and evaluated supplier conduct, work with suppliers to address issues and make improvements where necessary.
You can find more information about our approach to Human Rights here
We have set up regular sustainability networking calls for all employees involved in sustainability projects and programs to ensure company-wide alignment on all levels. On top of this, adidas has developed a company-wide sustainability training program available to all employees, educating them on how to think and act sustainably. This enables them to become sustainability ambassadors and encourages them to make personal and professional commitments that will contribute to a cleaner planet. We have also initiated a sustainability training program for our retail colleagues, with the objective of informing, engaging, and inspiring our entire team and, by extension, the consumers they interact with on a daily basis.
We seek to ensure that we address the topics that are most salient to our business and our stakeholders, and the challenges ahead. To identify these topics, we openly engage with our stakeholders and consider their views and opinions in when making decisions that shape our day-to-day -operations. Our stakeholders are those people or organizations who affect – or are affected by – our operations, including the following:
- adidas employees
- Authorizers: governments, trade associations, shareholders and the Executive Board
- Business partners: suppliers, licensees and service providers
- Workers in our suppliers’ factories
- Human rights defenders: such as trade unions and community activists
- Opinion-formers: journalists, community members and special interest groups
- Customers: professional athletes, distributors, retailers and consumers
Engaging openly with stakeholders and establishing ways to increase transparency and disclosure has long been central to our approach. The adidas Stakeholder Relations Guideline specifies key principles for the development of stakeholder relations and the different forms of stakeholder engagement.
adidas participates in a variety of industry associations, multi-stakeholder organizations, and non-profit initiatives. Through these memberships, we work closely with other leading companies from a variety of different sectors to develop sustainable business approaches and to discuss social and environmental topics on both global and local levels. We use collaborations and partnerships to build leverage for systemic change in our industry, such as strengthening chemical management practices and raising standards in the cotton supply chain. In addition, we are building awareness and knowledge of laws and rights among factory management and workers by partnering with leading providers such as the International Labor Organization’s (ILO) Better Work program, and the United Nation’s International Organization for Migration, which ensures that the labor rights of foreign and migrant workers are upheld in the adidas supply chain.
When you have a well-developed approach to sustainability, as adidas has, engagement is rarely a one-off event: stakeholder relationships develop over time and, along the way, the nature of the dialogue changes and matures. Where there is a positive and open approach to engagement, perspectives can be shared, differences respected and, at times, new partnerships forged.
Companies do not operate in isolation from society and our stakeholders have a legitimate interest in the way we do business. adidas stakeholders are a diverse group, which translates into a diverse range of engagements, some continuous and spanning many years and some targeted, based on current issues or trends requiring critical feedback. We seek to maintain an active and open dialogue with local and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs), labor rights advocacy groups, human rights advocacy groups, trade unions, investors, analysts, national and international government agencies, as well as academics. adidas also participates in a series of long-term purpose-built fora and multi-stakeholder initiatives, including the Fair Labor Association (FLA), Partnership for Sustainable Textiles (‘Textilbündnis’) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Forum on Due Diligence in the Garment and Footwear Sector, among others.
An analysis of adidas’ current primary stakeholder engagements is maintained on an ongoing basis and reviewed at least annually.
Organization |
Type |
Member since |
Status |
Reason for participation |
Apparel and Footwear International RSL Management (AFIRM) Working Group |
Industry Association |
2004 |
Founding member and participating company. |
Industry-leading group that strives to reduce the impact of harmful substances and tracks regulatory compliance. |
Multi-Stakeholder Organization |
2004 |
Founding member and participating company. |
To promote measurable improvements in the key environmental and social impacts of cotton cultivation worldwide. |
|
Multi-Stakeholder Organization |
2018 |
Founding member and member of the advisory group |
To promote human rights in sports by generating awareness, building capacity and delivering impact. |
|
Industry Association |
2009 |
Member and participating company; interim Vice Chair of the sustainability working group. |
To engage with players in the outdoor industry on sustainability matters. |
|
Non-Profit Organization |
2006 |
Founding member (Reebok) and participating company; Board seat. |
To promote transparency and share audit findings and remedial action plans across the industry. |
|
Non-Profit Organization |
1999 |
Founding member and participating company; Board seat. |
Provides independent accreditation and oversight of our internal programs. |
|
Industry Alliance |
2019 |
Participating Company |
To support collaborative measures in regard to climate action, ocean conversation and biodiversity |
|
Government-led multi-stakeholder initiative |
2015 |
Participating company; member of the Review and Chemicals working groups |
To promote measurable social, ecological and economic improvements along the textile and apparel supply chain |
|
Non-profit environmental organization |
2015 |
Participating company |
Minimizes the use of hazardous chemicals and their impact on health and the environment, and promote sustainable innovation |
|
Industry Association |
2006 |
Founding member and participating company. |
To improve environmental conditions in the leather supply chain. |
|
Collaboration Network |
2015 |
Founding member with seat in the steering committee |
Thought leader in ocean conservation and eco innovation, creating awareness and forging collaborations to end the destruction of the oceans. |
|
Independent, binding agreement between brands and trade unions |
2013 |
Participating company |
Work towards a safe and healthy garment and textile industry in Bangladesh. |
|
Multi-Stakeholder organisation |
2018 |
Founding member and participating company. |
Develop practical solutions for the textile industry, to minimise fibre fragmentation and release to the environment from manufacturing and the product life cycle. |
|
UN-supported industry initiative |
2018 |
Participating company |
To tackle climate change in the fashion sector based on agreed company commitments |
|
Industry Association |
1985 |
Founding member and participating company; Chair of CSR Committee. |
Represents the sporting goods industry in various venues and drives alignment among members. |
|
Industry Association |
2011 |
Founding member and participating company. |
Industry-leading group that strives to reduce the impact of harmful substances. |
The examples below show how we have been engaging with stakeholders over recent years. They outline the process of the engagements, their conclusions, or results.
Human rights and labor topics
- Transparency in human rights: adidas has maintained a close relationship with the Business and Human Rights Resource Center (BHRRC) since its establishment more than 20 years ago. As an NGO, BHRRC operates a digital platform to broadcast and share human rights allegations and track corporate accountability in the business and human rights space. In addition to offering timely responses to individual allegations raised by civil society, adidas has maintained a high level of transparency by supporting disclosure into BHRRC-managed trackers, for example the protection of workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disclosures to BHRCC are linked to other civil society and investor-backed benchmarks, such as the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark and KnowTheChain. We strongly value the transparency afforded by the BHRRC platform in communicating our ongoing efforts to address human rights issues and allegations. We continue to maintain a 100% response rate to all inquiries and requests for comment received from BHRRC.
- Cotton farming in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan: In 2011, adidas, together with other international brands and retailers, signed a civil society and investor-led Cotton Campaign pledge, calling for the Uzbek government to end forced child labor in the cotton sector of Uzbekistan. In response, the government invited the United Nation’s International Labor Organization (ILO) to develop a dedicated forced labor compliance program for cotton grown in the country. After many years of engagement and monitoring, in early 2022, the ILO and the Cotton Campaign’s local NGO affiliate, Uzbek Forum for Human Rights, confirmed that there was no longer evidence of government-imposed forced labor in the Uzbekistan cotton sector. As a result, the Cotton Campaign announced an end to its global boycott of Uzbek cotton. However, at present, adidas does not source products, materials or cotton from Uzbekistan. In 2018 adidas had signed a similar pledge with the Cotton Campaign to address forced labor in Turkmen-sourced cotton. While improving the traceability of our material, we have reminded our suppliers that we expect them to ensure, to the best of their knowledge, that none of the cotton or cotton materials used in our products originate from Turkmenistan. Click here to find out more about these pledges.
- Prison labor in Cambodia: adidas joined five other major brands in writing to the Cambodian government to express concern over the reported development of a prison rehabilitation scheme that permits garments to be manufactured by prison labor. In the communications with the government, the international buyers shared their concerns over the need to ensure the integrity of global supply chains and the potential risks that stem from unauthorized subcontracting in the apparel sector in Cambodia. Staff from the ILO’s Better Factories program – which monitors labor conditions in adidas supplier factories in Cambodia – provided us with regular updates on the situation and reached out to the government and other UN agencies, to obtain their perspectives and feedback. Our concerns were formally acknowledged by the Minister of Commerce and were addressed through an inter-ministerial committee, which was formed to examine and safeguard against undisclosed or illegal subcontracting arrangements in the apparel and footwear industry. The Minister of Commerce subsequently made public the government’s efforts in regulating contract supply chains.
- Trade unions and freedom of association (FOA) in Indonesia: Indonesia is a key sourcing country, with a very active and engaged trade union movement. To support and improve industrial relations in the workplace, we took a leading role in working with local unions and Oxfam Australia to develop an FOA protocol for the country. The official signing of the protocol took place in Jakarta in June 2011 and was hailed by the international labor rights movement as a "historic agreement" between sportswear brands, suppliers and unions. Since the launch of the protocol, we have seen a marked reduction in misunderstandings between management and union representatives regarding union activities, and greater empowerment of minority unions operating in a multi-union factory setting.
Environmental topics
- Greenpeace Detox campaign: In 2011, Greenpeace International initiated the 'Detox campaign,' calling for the zero discharge of all hazardous and persistent chemicals at all points in global supply chains: from the cotton fields to the mills and dye houses that make the fabric, up to the garment production. Initially, Greenpeace directed its campaign primarily towards sporting goods companies and well-known apparel brands in the belief that they can act as a catalyst for change for the whole industry. As part of their campaign, Greenpeace demanded that targeted companies publish a formal commitment to support the goal of 'zero discharge' and issued an individual roadmap specifying timelines and steps to meet this goal. From the outset, adidas entered into an in-depth engagement process with Greenpeace. We publicly committed to supporting Greenpeace's goal and have built a comprehensive chemical management program for our supply chain. At the same time, we stressed the fact that the management of chemicals in multi-tiered supply chains is a complex challenge, which requires many actors to play a role in achieving effective and sustainable solutions.
Sporting Events
Corporate responsibility is an important topic at various sporting events around the world. Our brand is visible all over the world, especially through our presence at major sports events such as the FIFA World Cup. This draws attention to the way we do business, the management of our sponsorships and the conditions under which our products are made. Therefore, adidas is taking a proactive approach in engaging with stakeholders about its corporate responsibility practices, especially related to bigger sporting events where adidas is a sponsor. We have arranged – and actively participated in – several events to raise attention on labor and human rights issues.
In the lead-up to the London 2012 Olympic Games, we hosted a stakeholder dialogue to capture a broad array of views on adidas' role and responsibilities in relation to sponsoring major sporting events. Labelled as the world's first sustainable Olympics, London 2012 presented new challenges as well as a unique learning opportunity for our company. It was the first Games to include a mandatory sustainable sourcing code and a third-party complaint mechanism for companies supplying goods to the London Organizing Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG). Building on our outreach from this dialogue, we developed and launched our own human rights complaint mechanism in 2012. The London Olympics dialogue also set the foundation for further engagement with the human rights advocacy community and international trade unions over the impacts of mega sporting events, which eventually led to the establishment of Centre for Sport and Human Rights in 2020.
In 2015, we invited participants from academia, NGOs, UN agencies, and sporting bodies to discuss the human rights impacts of major sporting events and the role of sponsors. The London dialogue focused on exploring the role of corporate sponsors in major sporting events with respect to upholding human rights and addressing the challenge of moving from principles to practice. From 2016 to 2019, we continued to contribute to a broader and deeper discussion around sports and human rights involving sporting bodies, governments, event organizers, broadcasters, civil society and business, organized through the Institute for Human Rights and Business' (IHRB) annual Sporting Chance Forum. The first engagement took place at the US State Department in Washington DC in 2016 (Click here to read the joint statement ‘Diverse Coalition Commits to Making Human Rights Central to the Planning, Delivery and Legacy of Mega-Sporting Events’) and in subsequent years in Geneva, Switzerland.
It was finally institutionalized through the signing of the Sporting Chance Principles on sport & human rights and the founding of the Centre for Sport and Human Rights in 2020. From the outset, adidas has acted as a member of the Advisory Council and provided financial and in-kind support. The Centre for Sport and Human Rights aims to share knowledge, build capacity and strengthen the accountability of all those involved in sport through collective action and promotion of those principles.
Although adidas as a sponsor was not involved in the decision to award the World Cup to Qatar, as a sponsor, since 2017 adidas has engaged on a continuous basis with FIFA over the 2022 World Cup and reached out to stakeholders including the Qatari government, the Supreme Committee for the Delivery of the World Cup, international human rights and labor advocacy groups and trade unions. Following the award of the World Cup to Qatar, we called for FIFA to establish an independent Human Rights Advisory Board (HRAB), to inform the development of their human rights program, globally, including the hosting of World Cup events. adidas held a seat on the HRAB from 2017-21 and together with trade unions and human rights advocates, provided FIFA with critical feedback on the implementation of the 2022 World Cup, including workers welfare, migrant labor rights, child safeguarding and LGTBQI rights. For the 2022 World Cup, we have undertaken human rights and environmental due diligence of our supply chain activities and our Qatar partnership programs. Most recently on the implementation of effective grievance systems for the Qatar 2022 World Cup.
In a separate initiative, we are actively supporting the establishment of a Migrant Worker Information Centre in Qatar. The center was proposed by the global building industry union Building and Wood Workers’ International (BWI), and builds on worker welfare programs first developed for the 2022 World Cup construction sites.
Statements
ARCHIVE OF STATEMENTS
adidas Verifies FSC® Certification for Laces adidas unveiled its 'Clean Classics' sustainable footwear collection in September 2020. The sneakers' uppers are made from 70% recycled materials. Renewable and reclaimed rubber is used for the sole. All processed materials, including adhesives and dyes, are free of animal ingredients. The laces are made of paper. adidas intended to source FSC-certified paper for the laces as a sustainable source material for the 'Clean Classics'. Currently, we are not able to fully trace whether this certified paper actually went into the production. We are in close contact with our suppliers and the certifier FSC to clarify this. In addition, we will further expand our cooperation with FSC in the future with regard to the procurement of sustainable raw materials. As an immediate measure, we do not use any reference to FSC certification in the context of product presentation in our online store.
At adidas, our engagement with governments and parliaments around the world is guided by our principles of impartiality, transparency, and compliance.
We are committed to impartiality. Based on principles laid out in our Compliance Policy and Charitable Giving Guidelines, adidas does not support any local, regional or national political parties, campaigns or candidates. In addition, we are transparent about our political engagement. We disclose our lobbying activities in Germany and the EU regularly in the German Lobby Register and the European Union Transparency Register, including public grants we receive from the German government and the EU. We register our lobbying activities in the United States with the U.S. Congress on a quarterly basis, according to the U.S. Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. These disclosures are published on the official website of the U.S. House of Representatives.
In our Fair Play Code of Conduct and Compliance Policy, we set clear standards and requirements for interactions with governments, authorities, and public officials. In addition, we have an internal Government Affairs Policy in place that sets clear guardrails for engaging with governments, authorities, and public officials.
Policy development
As a company, we support human rights and the protection of the environment. Therefore, our concerns over violation of human rights and negative environmental impacts, and the potential risks that these would pose to adidas, require our close engagement with governments in a host of different countries. In addition, adidas is impacted by several policy areas such as trade, intellectual property, and sustainability. Yet, we only join lobbying efforts after careful consideration. Where changes in the relevant policy areas concern us, we engage in the formal decision-making process, such as consultations, primarily through our industry associations and according to our Fair Play Code of Conduct. For major policy issues, we report the amount of money we spent.
Industry associations
We engage with a selected number of organizations across the globe including national and international chambers of commerce, industry and business associations, and multi-stakeholder initiatives. These associations serve as a platform to collaborate with peers and stakeholders, monitor regulatory and economic developments, and voice policy interests. These organizations focus, amongst others, on advocating free trade, ensuring intellectual property protection, monitoring national legislation, setting sustainability-related industry standards and providing for exchange and networking. Our membership in these associations is guided by our Association Membership Policy, Government Affairs Policy, and Compliance Policy. In addition, memberships are coordinated globally and reviewed on an annual basis.
As we are committed to transparency, we disclose all relevant memberships in the following table, including a brief description of the organization and adidas’ financial contributions to each association. In 2021, our contributions amounted to €1.2 million to all industry association. Mandatory memberships as well as fees and payments that are subject to confidentiality were not included.